OUR IMPACT ON
GAUTENG

South Africa’s economic capital, Gauteng is the smallest of the country’s 9 provinces. In spite of its popular acclaim for being the ‘city of gold’ in the 2016 South African Multidimensional Poverty Index has a 4.6% poverty headcount. This is very high considering that Gauteng continued to be the place many South Africa seek out for economic empowerment.

Its 44.1% intensity of poverty is a reflection of the 35% of the population that is food insecure demonstrating the need for Operation Hunger to develop Gauteng’s data.

At the underlying level, nutrition equity is caused by the way that people’s everyday social, psychological/behavioural and material circumstances interact with their wider environments.

These environments include: access to adequate and quality food; provision for infant care; healthcare environments; and wider living environments (including sanitation and opportunities for physical activity).

Operation Hunger has put together the latest data using the conceptual framework consistent with the determinants of undernutrition and prevalence of malnutrition to comprehensively elucidate barriers and opportunities leading to unhealthy nutrition outcomes.

Regional/Provincial Data

Economic Data

  • General Government Services 2.07% 2.07%
  • Agriculture 5.9% 5.9%
  • Manufacturing 7.1% 7.1%
  • Construction 0.37% 0.37%
  • Mining 9.4% 9.4%
  • Other 75.16% 75.16%

Top Imports Market

28.8%

CHINA

52%

MOZAMBIQUE

81.8%

VIETNAM

Top Export Market

20.54%

ZIMBABWE

16.23%

NETHERLANDS

10.53%

ZAMBIA

*Please note that all percentages are subject to change, as the current figures are based on 2024 statistics.

Employment in Gauteng

The estimated total of the working age population:
10 799 000

Employed

Economically Inactive

Unemployed

Formal and informal Sector employment

The formal sector is accounting for 55. 2% of all employment. 
The informal accounts for 32.1 % of all employment.

Youth labour market trends

working-age population aged 15 to 34 years; 14 995 Employed, 7242 unemployed, 14 086 Not economically active, 3131 Discouraged work-seekers

Spatial Considerations

Rural areas have been more affected than urban areas and urban areas have been
more prone to recover jobs than rural areas.

Employment Demographics characteristics

%

Male

%

Female

Population Dynamics

Total population 15.8Million

Plus – 852 992 net migration

Inequality and human Development

0.64

Gini Coefficient

Education

%

Tertiary

%

Upper Secondary

%

Lower Secondary

%

Primary Completed

%

Some Primary

%

No Schooling

%

Learner Enrolment (733 917)

%

NSC Results

Life expectancy in KwaZulu-Natal

63.8 years

Male

69.2 years

Female

Health

37 Hospitals
36 Health Care Community Centre
177 Clinics

Leading Natural Causes

Diabetes
Heart Disease
HIV/AIDS

Percentage of households that lived in formal, informal and traditional dwellings

%

Formal

%

Informal

%

Traditional

%

Other

Types of Sanitation

Access to sanitation

%

Basic Sanitation

%

Limited Sanitation

%

Unimproved Sanitation

Source of drinking water

95% of households have access to piped water as their main source of water
5% Other

Food Systems/ Environment Determinants



Grains

Wheat (16.10%), Maize (13%),
Soy beans (7.8%),

ï…¹

Fruit & Veg

Apples (16,8%), Pears (15.6%), Banana (11,8%), Carrots (44.0%), Cabbabe (20.4%), Onions (28,0%), Tomatoes (10,6%), Potatoes (11,5%)



Animal
Production

Milk (12.7%),
Poultry (8.1%)

Nature of agricultural production activities per 2019

%

Livestock Production

%

Poultry Production

%

Grain and Food Crop

%

Industrial Crops

%

Fruit and Veg Crops

Percentage of households experiencing food
adequacy or inadequacy

%

Food Access Severely inadequate

%

Food Access Inadequate

%

Food access adequate

Percentage of households involved in
agricultural activities:

%

Household Consumption of Foods from
Different Food Groups

Consistency of Food Access by Food
Security Status

Food Affordability

Monthly Household Expenditures

Percentage of individuals and households benefiting from social grants

19.2%

PERSONS

31.5%

HOUSEHOLD

Percentage distribution of sources of household income

70.3%

SALARIES

32.1%

GRANTS

10.7%

REMITTANCE

19.1%

BUSINESS INCOME

3.8%

PENSIONS